Yuga Labs receives $1.6M in historic Ryder Ripps NFT lawsuit

by Sid

Ryder Ripps and Business Associate Ordered to Pay Yuga Labs $1.57 Million Plus Legal Fees

A district judge in the United States has ruled in favor of Yuga Labs in a lawsuit against Ryder Ripps and his business associate, ordering them to pay $1.57 million plus legal fees. The legal battle between the parties has come to an end with the judge’s decision.

H3: Background of the Lawsuit

Yuga Labs, the creator of Bored Ape Yacht Club (BAYC) NFT collection, filed a lawsuit against Ryder Ripps and his business associate over allegations of copyright infringement and unauthorized use of the BAYC intellectual property. The lawsuit, filed in a US district court, accused Ripps and his associate of creating and selling NFTs that were based on the BAYC collection without permission.

H3: Ruling and Financial Penalty

The district judge presiding over the case found in favor of Yuga Labs, ruling that Ryder Ripps and his business associate had indeed infringed on BAYC’s intellectual property rights. As a result, they were ordered to pay $1.57 million in damages to Yuga Labs, in addition to covering the legal fees incurred during the lawsuit.

H3: Impact on the NFT Community

The ruling in favor of Yuga Labs has been seen as a significant victory for the NFT community and its efforts to protect intellectual property rights. It serves as a warning to those who may seek to capitalize on popular NFT collections without proper authorization.

H3: Response from Yuga Labs

Following the judge’s ruling, Yuga Labs released a statement expressing satisfaction with the outcome of the lawsuit. The company emphasized the importance of protecting the intellectual property of NFT creators and the broader NFT community.

H3: Final Thoughts

The legal dispute between Yuga Labs and Ryder Ripps and his business associate has now been resolved, with the district judge ruling in favor of Yuga Labs. The financial penalty of $1.57 million plus legal fees serves as a reminder of the consequences of infringing on NFT intellectual property rights. It also sets a precedent for future cases involving the unauthorized use of NFT collections.

Related Posts